🔗 Share this article

Imagine this: a happy the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Now, place it with a dejected Benjamin Sesko in a Manchester United kit, appearing like he's missed a sitter. Do not worry finding a real picture of that miss; context is the enemy. Now, add statistics in a large, silly font. Don't forget some emoticons. Post the image everywhere.

Would you mention that Højlund's goal count features strikes in the premier European competition while his counterpart isn't playing in continental tournaments? Certainly not. And would you highlight that four of the Dane's goals came against Belarus and Greece, or that Denmark is much stronger to Slovenia and creates far more chances. You run online for a major brand, raw engagement is your livelihood, United are the prime target, and context is the thing to avoid.

So the cycle of online material turns. The next job is to sift through a 44-minute interview featuring Peter Schmeichel and extract the part where he calls the acquisition of Sesko "weird". There's a bit, where he prefaces his comments by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, remove that part. Nobody wants that. Simply make sure "weird" and "the player" appear together in the headline. People will be furious.

This Time of Potential and Premature Judgment

Mid-autumn has long been one of my favourite times to observe football. The leaves swirl, winds shift, the teams and tactics are newly formed, everything is new and yet everything is beginning to form. Key players of the coming months are staking their claims. The summer market is shut. Nobody is mentioning the quadruple yet. Everyone are in contention. Right now, anything is possible.

Yet, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has also been one of my most disliked times to consume news on football. Because although no outcomes are decided, something must always be getting settled. Jack Grealish is reborn. Florian Wirtz has been a major letdown. Is Antoine Semenyo the top performer in the league at this moment? Please a decision now.

The Player as Patient Zero

And for numerous reasons, Benjamin Sesko feels like Patient Zero in this respect, a player inextricably trapped between football's two countervailing, unavoidable forces. The imperative to delay final conclusions, to let layers of technical texture and strategic understanding to develop. And the demand to produce permanent verdicts, a conveyor belt of opinions and memes, context-free criticisms and pointless comparisons, a square that can not truly be circled.

I do not propose to provide a in-depth evaluation of Sesko's stint at United so far. The guy has started four times in the top flight in a highly unpredictable team, scored two goals, and had a mere of 116 contacts with the ball. What exactly are we evaluating? Nor will I attempt to replicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's notable debate "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits argue thrillingly on a popular show over whether Sesko needs ten strikes to be deemed successful this year (one pundit), or whether it is more like 12 or 13 (Wright).

A Harsh Reality

For all this I enjoyed watching Sesko at Leipzig: a big, screeching sports car of a forward, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his talents: afforded the freedom to attack but also the freedom to fail. Partly this is why United feels like the cruellest place he could possibly be right now: a place where "brutal verdicts" are summarily issued in about the time it takes to watch a pre-roll ad, the club with the largest and most pitiless gap between the patience and space he needs, and the time and air he is going to get.

There was an example of this over the national team pause, when a widely shared infographic conveniently stated that the player had been judged – by a wide margin – the poorest acquisition of the summer transfer window by a survey of 20 agents. Naturally, the press are not the only ones in this. Club channels, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of fake followers: all parties with a vested interest is now basically operating along the same principles, an environment deliberately geared for provocation.

The Mental Cost

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What are we doing to us? Are we aware, on some level, what this endless sluice of aggravation is doing to our minds? Separate from the inherent strangeness of playing in the middle of it all, aware on some surreal chain-reaction level that every single thing about them is now essentially material, product, public property to be packaged and traded.

And yes, in part this is because it's Manchester United, the corpse that continues to feed the cycle, a big club that must constantly be generating the big feelings. However, partly this is a temporary malaise, a pendulum of judgment most clearly and harshly observed at this season, roughly four weeks after the transfer market shut. Throughout the summer we have been desiring footballers, eulogising them, drooling over them. Yet, just a few weeks in, a lot of those same players are now being disdained as broken goods. Should we start to be concerned about a new signing? Was Arsenal's purchase of Viktor Gyökeres necessary? What was the purpose of Randal Kolo Muani?

The Bigger Picture

It seems fitting that he meets Liverpool on Sunday: a team at once on a long unbeaten run at home in the league and yet in their own situation of feverish crisis, like submitting a missing person’s report on someone who popped to the store 30 minutes ago. Defensively suspect. Their star finished. Alexander Isak an expensive flop. Arne Slot losing his hair.

Maybe we have failed to understand the way the storyline of football has begun to supplant football itself, to inflect the way we watch it, an whole competition repivoted around discussion topics and reaction, something that happens in the background while we browse through our devices, unable to detach from the constant flow of opinions and more takes. It may be this player taking the hit right now. However, we're all sacrificing a part of the experience here.